
Duality… We use and live with it almost so seamlessly in our lives and we tend not to notice it when we do. For example, the difference between life/death, light/dark, faith/science. These things seem natural to think about for us. Everything, to me, seems to be a part of its own system, usually of thought, but mostly of interrelation. In other words, one implies the other. Life implies death, light implies dark, and faith implies science, and vice versa in all examples.
What do I mean by implies? I mean that we cannot know life if not for death, nor can we know death if not for life. How do we know that we are alive? Because we are not dead. It seems oversimplified, but that’s really it. How do we know what light is without looking at light next to dark? We can’t. Science is a systematically organized body of knowledge on a particular subject, or just a body of knowledge. Faith is a complete trust or confidence in someone or something, or simply belief without evidence. We tend to see these as dualities, but they are really just the difference between light and dark, or life and death. Neither one is good or bad, they just are. One implies the other. Ignorance implies knowledge.
So, when I say that to have faith is to be ignorant, I am not saying that having faith is a bad thing, just that it’s a state of mind. I like to differentiate between faith and “blind faith“. Having faith, or confidence, in someone or something of which we can’t know whether or not we’ll be disappointed, is only good for us in certain instances — mostly social. Blind faith is a belief in something regardless of evidence or lack thereof. For example, someone says that they believe there are fairies in the garden, but lack the evidence of their existence. If they were to express this belief to another person, the other person would then request evidence. The person with the belief in the garden fairies would then go on to say that they just need to believe and stop being so pragmatic. In other words, they are trying to justify their blind faith in things they cannot prove by dismissing the other person as being too reasonable.
Why do I bring this up? I run into this problem with friends and family who see my non-belief in their sky daddy as problematic or ignorant, when I know what it’s like to believe in such things and have come to my own conclusion that it cannot be proved one way or the other. I just lean more toward it not existing. I am referring, of course, to their Christian beliefs.
I can’t say that I necessarily think that Christianity is wrong, so to speak, but that so many people take things too literally and out of context. For me, though I’m not a Christian, and I don’t believe in a deity, per se, I do know what it is to be a Christian since that’s what I grew up with. I know the desire to want to be closer to God in my “heart of hearts” and to want nothing more than to live up to the inspired word of God. I found this thought pattern to be too restrictive and contradictory to my nature. There are things in the Old Testament that weren’t meant to be anything more than an account of the time they occurred. I think the gospels were meant to set believers free from the dogma of their current religion, connecting them directly to the Almighty instead of a supposed authority figure as intermediary. When a church was set up as yet another authority, the teachings of the Christ were skewed and once again corrupted into its former ways. This, I believe, is what went wrong. Jesus never said, “Create a church and act on my behalf as intermediary between the people and God.” He told his followers to spread the gospels — the good news — so as to save them from the ways of the old religion. That there is no more need to sacrifice for penance as he was the ultimate sacrifice for all. This is my understanding and I cannot see what’s so good about the gospels as they are handed down in this day and age.
When people use their beliefs to justify their bigotry, hatred, and intolerance, that’s where I have a problem. Not with the religion, itself, but with the people pushing their beliefs onto others, attempting to force their dogma, and therefore setting themselves up as an authority in another person’s life. As if to say, “I know better what’s good for you, so you better listen up and do as I say. If you have anything to say against me doing this, you are persecuting me for my beliefs. You must be saved and I can help you. Submit to me and my beliefs.” I find this abhorrent to good reason and compassion.
Now, this isn’t to say that I’m against Christianity, or Christians, or any particular religion, just some of their methods and practices of “conversion”. A good religion isn’t meant for oppression, but for liberation of the spirit. To me, spirit takes on a different meaning than it does for many people. Spirit, to me, is our consciousness, whether present or sub. Soul, for me, is how we feel and empathize, especially with or about others. It’s our experiences in life. The soul is our memories, feelings, and experiences throughout every situation we go through. It’s the way we interact with our environment and with our fellow living beings. Of course, this is just how I understand these terminologies and how I use them.
Back to the topic at hand: have you noticed the dualities of this ‘OR‘ mentality? Good and bad are just two different choices of thought and belief about any particular thing or person in a single judgment. When we notice that we’re judging, we tend to mentally say, “No. Stop. I’m judging again,” you are again judging, which then turns into a never ending cycle of judgment. To rid oneself of judging, notice it, acknowledge it, and let it be where it is and then let it go. If you feel that it has no place in the current situation, then recognize the pattern and learn how to let it go. See things as they truly are, in reality, not in your biased thoughts about it. When you can see it for what it is, and know the implications of either side of the judgment of said situation, you can make better decisions about what to do about it, if that’s what you truly want.
But, to truly know the reality of a situation, one must know oneself as one truly is, as one really and truly is in reality, and not in some fantasy or unrealistic feelings about oneself. When we truly know ourselves, we can better decide what to do in any situation because we know who we are and what it is that drives our decisions. It all ties into the thirty-third chapter of the Tao Te Ching:
Thirty-Three
Knowing others is wisdom;
Knowing the self is enlightenment.
Mastering others requires force;
Mastering the self needs strength.
He who knows he has enough is rich.
Perseverance is a sign of willpower.
He who stays where he is endures.
To die but not perish is to be eternally present.